Sun, Oct 25, 2026Los AngelesNew YorkChicagoHoustonPhoenixPhiladelphiaSan FranciscoSeattleAtlantaBoston
Politics · Elon Musk

Elon Musk’s America PAC Channels $76 Million Into Final Midterm Push

The billionaire’s political committee deployed massive funds in October, focusing heavily on the contested Texas Senate race and digital advertising.

By Xiaoyu Wang ·

A significant financial injection has intensified the final days of the midterm elections, with Elon Musk’s personal political committee contributing over $76 million to assist Republican candidates. This substantial sum, reported to the Federal Election Commission on Thursday evening, marks a decisive escalation in the final stretch of the campaign. The funds are part of a broader strategy to influence key races, with a particular emphasis on the contested Senate seat in Texas.

The timeline of this spending reveals a sharp increase in activity during the first two weeks of October. The group, known as America PAC, spent nearly $43 million during this period. As the election approaches, the committee retains a robust financial position, holding approximately $47 million in cash. This liquidity allows for continued heavy spending in the critical days before voters head to the polls.

The Texas Senate race has emerged as the primary recipient of these new resources. The committee allocated $15.2 million to this specific contest, a figure that doubles the amount spent in that state throughout the summer. The expenditure was split between negative attacks on the Democratic candidate, James Talarico, and positive promotion of the Republican contender, Ken Paxton. Specifically, $12.4 million was directed toward criticizing Talarico, while $2.8 million supported Paxton’s campaign message.

Subsequent daily filings indicate that the focus on Talarico has not waned. Since the initial report, an additional $9.1 million has been spent against him. This brings the total spending against Talarico this cycle to nearly $28 million. This amount represents roughly 40 percent of everything the committee has spent to support or oppose candidates. Furthermore, the committee has shifted its advertising strategy toward online platforms, spending $11.4 million on digital ads in the same two-week window. This digital spend is now comparable to the combined total for mail and texting efforts.

Musk’s overall influence in this election cycle is evident in the total amounts transferred to Republican political groups. According to an analysis of Federal Election Commission filings, he has provided more than $445 million. This makes him the largest known individual donor in the midterms. Of this total, more than $165 million has flowed to America PAC since July. The committee declined to offer further comment on the recent expenditures.

Beyond financial support, Musk has engaged directly with the narrative surrounding the Texas race through social media. He has posted on X, expressing that there is something deeply wrong with Talarico. He also labeled the candidate a creep and claimed, without providing evidence, that Talarico would vote to take away children and transition them. Earlier in the month, Musk amplified a false claim that Talarico had received treatment at a mental health facility. Talarico responded quickly, stating that there is something deeply wrong with a political system that allows one trillionaire to buy his own personal U.S. Senator.

Despite the heavy spending, the Texas race remains closely contested. An Emerson College poll of 1,000 likely voters in Texas, conducted between October 17 and 19, shows Talarico at 48 percent and Paxton at 46 percent. The difference falls within the poll’s margin of error of three points, indicating that the outcome is still uncertain.

The stakes for Musk extend well beyond the result in Texas. If Democrats secure a majority in the House, the lawmakers poised to lead key committees have indicated they will investigate his role in the Department of Government Efficiency. They also plan to examine federal contracts awarded to his companies and the numerous conflicts of interest. Zoe Lofgren, a Democrat from California, described the number of these conflicts as astounding. Unified Democratic control of Congress would pose even greater challenges for his business interests.

Silicon Valley Democrats have added another specific target to their list of priorities. On Friday, they sent a letter to the White House demanding an investigation into restrictions on SpaceX’s Starshield satellite service in Ukraine. Representatives Sam Liccardo, Jimmy Panetta, and Ro Khanna signed the letter. They vowed that the next Congress will closely scrutinize federal funding awarded to Musk’s businesses.

Source: Wired

More Politics · Report a business

Get True Press Desk in your inboxYour daily read on the news. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get True Press Desk in your inboxYour daily read on the news. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.